The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to stay a single-judge order directing the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLU Consortium) to revise the result

Delhi High Court division bench opined that the single judge has examined the two questions carefully & has found that a different view is not a plausible one.

The bench prima facie found no error in the view taken by the single judge with respect to two questions and clarified the consortium was free to declare the results in terms of the single judge's decision.

The Delhi High Court declined to intervene in an order directing the Consortium of National Law Universities to revise CLAT-2025 results due to errors in the answer key. A bench supported the single judge's decision backing the aspirant's plea for correcting two questions deemed wrong.

The Delhi HC Justice Jyoti Singh in her ruling mentioned the mistakes in questions 14 and 100 as "demonstrably clear" and observed that ignoring these mistakes would be unjust to candidates. The CLAT 2025 revised result once released,

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to pass any interim order staying its single-judge bench's directive requiring the C

The Delhi High Court ordered the NLUs to review the merit list, which was first released on Dec 7, 2024. The first seat allotment result, scheduled for December 26, 2024, has now been delayed

The Consortium of NLUs defended examination process, highlighting that results were finalised after recommendations from expert committees.

The Delhi High Court ordered the Consortium of NLUs to revise the CLAT 2025 merit list due to errors in the answer ke

The Delhi high court directed the NLU Consortium to make corrections with regard to two questions, saying that the errors in the same were ‘demonstrably clear’

The case was brought before the court by a candidate who appeared for the CLAT-UG 2025 examination on December 1 and challenged the answers to five specific questions.